U.N. chiefs held talks with Russian officials Friday on the Black Sea agreements about exporting grain and fertilizers, eight days before one of the deals is set to expire, but no settlements were reached.
U.N. humanitarian chief Martin Griffiths and Rebeca Grynspan, head of the U.N. trade and development agency UNCTAD, met a high-level delegation from Moscow, led by Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Vershinin. The talks took place behind closed doors at the U.N. Palais des Nations headquarters in Geneva and finished by midafternoon.
“The discussions updated on progress made in facilitating the unimpeded export of food and fertilizers, including ammonia, originating from the Russian Federation to global markets,” a U.N. representative said. “The U.N. team briefed on steps taken to facilitate payments, shipping insurance, and access to EU ports for grains and fertilizer, among others.”
10.2 million tons exported
Two agreements brokered by the U.N. and Turkey were signed July 22. The first was to allow the export of Ukrainian grain blocked by Russia’s war in the country, while the second was on the export of Russian food and fertilizers despite Western sanctions imposed on Moscow following its invasion of Ukraine.
The 120-day Black Sea Grain Initiative runs out November 19, and the United Nations is seeking to renew it for one year. Moscow, however, has not yet said whether it will agree to that.
It has complained that the second agreement exempting its fertilizers from sanctions, which is due to run for three years, is not being respected.
“The U.N. calls on all actors to expedite the removal of any remaining impediments to the export and transportation of fertilizers to countries most in need,” the U.N. representative added.
Ukraine is one of the world’s top grain producers, and the Russian invasion had blocked 20 million metric tons of grain in its ports until the safe passage deal was struck.
Until Thursday, 10.2 million tons of grains and other foodstuffs had been exported from Ukraine under the deal, relieving some fears about a deepening global food security crisis.
Very serious implications
The U.N.’s Food and Agriculture Organization said the implications could be very concerning for global food security if the deal is not renewed.
“We see it as an important initiative that has improved food availability,” said Boubaker Ben Belhassen, director of the FAO’s markets and trade division.
“However, should we be in a scenario that nobody wants to see, that there is a termination of the deal, I think the situation could be really difficult and the implications could be very serious,” he told reporters via video link from Rome, where the FAO is based.
He pointed to global food security, prices, availability and food staples.
Ben Belhassen said that in the short term, prices would increase, especially for wheat, maize and sunflower seed oil, while availability of grains on the global market would go down.
There could be a heavy impact on countries that depend on Black Sea imports, notably in the Middle East and North Africa.
Source: Voice of America